In the report you can click on a lecture by Michael Blue: "How do new media feel?" Interesting to listen to, duration approx. 50 minutes. Much is based on the work of the media scientist Marshall McLuhan (1911 - 1980)

at the beginning (perhaps a quote from McLuhan);

"It took me decades to really understand that every science as well as my research areas - religion & politics - are founded solely on media: through symbols, words, texts."

It is about religion and politics and if we agree with Clausewitz that war is the continuation of politics by other means, war is also the continuation of religion

oh oh 

Let's move on quickly to get to the topic

In German:

"Every new technology is an evolutionary extension of our own bodies. The evolutionary process has shifted from biology to technology to an eminent degree since electricity. Every extension of our selves creates a new human environment and an entirely new set of interpersonal relationships. The beneficial or harmful environments (they are complementary) created by these extensions of our bodies saturate our senses and yet are invisible. Every new technology thus changes the human distortion of sensory perceptions, creating new areas of perception and new areas of blindness. This is true of clothing, of the alphabet, of the radio."

For most people this is too scientific. I would therefore like to take an example.

The Bubble Theory to Explain the World

This physical theory states that an infinite number of bubbles have formed from space, gravity, energy, etc. Articles on this topic are not available to theoretical physicists who are not specialized in the subject. However, there are some compelling conclusions. We simply believe these scientists. We do not believe that it must necessarily be so, we believe that it could be so. Because the theory contains religious dynamite. If it is correct, a world is created and exists for several billion years. Then it collapses.

The development of theories about the world seems to be like this. The idea that the earth must be spherical arose relatively early on. In the Ptolemy world view, the movements of the sun and moon, the planets and other stars can now be described with scientific accuracy. This is followed by the Keppler world view. It was less accurate than the Ptolemy world view. It was only with the invention of computers by Schickhardt that the Keppler world view reached, surpassed and replaced the Ptolemy one. The orbit of the earth played no role. In the Ptolemy world view, the earth was also a sphere. The use of logarithmic tables and slide rules enabled Newton to implement his world view. The earth was no longer the center but the solar system. In the next stage, the solar system was no longer the center of the world but the Milky Way. The sun was just an unimportant sun among many others, on the edge of the Milky Way, the galaxies began to move. The time of the spaceship Enterprise and the UFO began

It happened on November 22, 1968 in the 65th episode in the cosmos of the television series Star Trek: The black African-American Lieutenant Nyota Uhura, played by Nichelle Nichols, kissed her white boss, Captain James Tiberius Kirk, played by William Shatner, in the episode "Plato's Stepchildren". The scandal over this first film kiss between a black and a white man in prudish America was perfect.

info from Ingeneur.de

The woman looks very good. Who wouldn't let her kiss them and let's just say... have a snuggle... carry out an activity that could produce mixed-race children.

We are still on the topic

Religion & Politics – can only be justified through media: through symbols, words, texts.

The values in the USA in 1968 were racism, which was also upheld in the media. But the USA is helping to change the geocentricity in people's minds. Through the moon landing. That is actually supposed to be progress. But where does progress come from? From the East. Because Stalin was all about progress, he built rockets and sent them into space.

everything has something to do with brain distortion

But we must stop now the hostages are in

acute danger to life

The Israeli state invaded Lebanon under its leadership.

Very briefly

As soon as there is time we will discuss further

and about my atheism. I do not rule out that there is a god, a paradise and the last judgement. And certainly not for scientific reasons. With a probability of 99.9% there is no god, with a probability of 0.1% there is no god.

doh that has quite consequences. A Catholic church father once preached to the athists:

Atheists, what do you have to lose? Suppose you are right. There is no hell. You die. And it is true. There is no hell. And you have gone into nothingness. Me too, of course. Not bad at all, because in nothingness there is no pain. Not even for me.

But let us assume that there is a resurrection and a hell. You will burn in it. For there will be weeping and chattering of teeth. So believe in God, say the creed and you are insured against hell.

We are talking about the good old days of ancient Rome. There were actually phases in which neither the Romans persecuted Christians nor Christians persecuted Romans who believed in the old gods. Because of the limited durability of papyrus (approximately 50 years), these times are poorly documented. Such sermons were almost always written down later. This plays no role for the philosophy of religion, because the logic remains the same.